Conshohocken and Philadelphia Premises Liability Lawyers
Philadelphia premises liability cases can be complicated. Cases often involve powerful defendants, insurance carriers, and property owners determined to minimize responsibility and blame the victim. Groen Strokoff O’Neill, LLC trial attorneys prepare premises liability cases that cover all aspects of evidence.
GSO Lawyers represents individuals and families seeking a premises liability attorney in Montgomery County, a slip and fall lawyer in Delaware County, and a property negligence trial lawyer in Bucks County, Chester County, and New Jersey, in addition to Philadelphia. We handle serious injury litigation involving unsafe commercial and residential properties across the region.
Our premise liability lawyers routinely litigate cases in Philadelphia County, Bucks, County, Chester County, Delaware County and Montgomery County, giving clients the advantage of deep local court knowledge and litigation experience. Victims searching for a “premises liability lawyer near me” trust GSO Lawyers because we combine legal strength and an intricate eye for details that have helped secure premises liability settlements of all sizes for our clients.

What Is Premises Liability?
Premises liability is a legal doctrine that holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions or negligent maintenance. Under premises liability law, property owners have a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions and warn visitors of known dangers that aren’t obvious.
When property owners breach this duty by failing to repair hazards, neglecting maintenance, or not warning of dangerous conditions and someone is injured as a result, the property owner can be held liable for the victim’s damages. Premises liability applies to all types of properties including retail stores, restaurants, apartment buildings, office buildings, parking lots, private homes, and public spaces.
Key Elements of Premises Liability in Pennsylvania
- Duty of Care – Property owners owe different levels of care depending on the visitor’s status:
- Invitees (customers, business visitors): Company must inspect for and remedy hazards.
- Licensees (social guests): Must warn of known hazards.
- Trespassers: Limited duty except to avoid willful harm. There are exceptions for child trespassers.
- Breach of Duty – The property owner failed to maintain safe conditions, repair known hazards, or warn of dangers.
- Causation – The unsafe condition directly caused the visitor’s injury.
- Damages – The victim suffered actual injuries and losses.
Premises liability claims require proving that the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and had reasonable time to fix it or warn visitors. Property owners cannot simply claim ignorance. They have a duty to regularly inspect their property for hazards. We investigate incidents occurring throughout Montgomery County, Delaware County, Bucks County, Chester County, and New Jersey, where notice requirements and comparative negligence laws affect litigation strategy.
Related Topics:

Common Defenses that Property Owners Try to Use in Premises Liability Lawsuits
Property owners and their insurance companies use a number of defense strategies to avoid liability. Some of those include such statements as:
“The Victim Was at Fault” (Comparative Negligence)
Property owners claim you weren’t paying attention, were distracted by your phone, were wearing inappropriate footwear, or were somewhere you shouldn’t have been. Pennsylvania’s comparative negligence law allows you to recover damages as long as you’re less than 51% at fault, though your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault.
“The Condition Was Obvious” (Open and Obvious Doctrine)
Defendants argue the hazard was so obvious that you should have seen and avoided it. However, Pennsylvania law recognizes exceptions; property owners can still be liable even for obvious hazards if they should have anticipated harm or if the hazard was unavoidable.
“We Didn’t Know About the Hazard”
Property owners claim they had no notice of the dangerous condition. However, they have a duty to regularly inspect their property. Your premises liability lawyer will investigate how long the condition existed and whether reasonable inspections would have discovered it.
“We Just Cleaned/Inspected That Area”
Properties often produce cleaning logs or inspection records claiming recent attention to the area. Your attorney will scrutinize these records for authenticity and completeness, as many are created after accidents or are incomplete.
“You Can’t Prove We Owned/Controlled the Property”
In complex property arrangements, defendants may try to shift responsibility to other parties. Your liability lawyer will identify all responsible parties including owners, property managers, tenants, and contractors.
“Your Injuries Aren’t That Serious”
Insurance companies minimize injury severity, claim injuries were pre-existing, or argue you didn’t need extensive treatment. Medical expert testimony and thorough documentation counter these arguments.
Types of Philadelphia Premises Liability Cases We Represent
Slip and Fall Accidents
Premises liability lawsuits involving falls on wet floors, icy sidewalks, uneven surfaces, torn carpeting, debris, or other hazardous conditions in stores, restaurants, office buildings, and other properties throughout Philadelphia.
Trip and Fall Accidents
Cases involving uneven pavement, broken steps, torn carpeting, unmarked changes in elevation, poor lighting, cluttered walkways, and other conditions causing people to trip and fall.
Inadequate Security and Negligent Security
Claims arising from forklifts, excavators, bulldozers, backhoes, and other heavy equipment causing crush injuries, rollovers, or striking workers due to inadequate training, blind spots, or equipment failures.
Stairway and Elevator Accidents
Claims involving defective stairs, missing handrails, broken elevators or escalators, inadequate lighting in stairwells, and violations of building codes causing serious injuries.
Swimming Pool Accidents
Premises liability cases involving drownings, near-drownings, diving injuries, slip and falls around pools, inadequate fencing, lack of supervision, and failure to maintain safe pool conditions.
Dog Bites and Animal Attacks
Lawsuits against property owners whose dogs or animals attack visitors, with Pennsylvania’s dog bite statute imposing strict liability for certain injuries.
Falling Objects and Merchandise
Cases involving merchandise, equipment, or building materials falling from shelves or overhead causing head injuries, broken bones, and other serious harm.
Toxic Exposure and Mold
Claims arising from exposure to toxic substances, mold, asbestos, lead paint, carbon monoxide, or other environmental hazards on residential or commercial properties.
Parking Lot and Parking Garage Accidents
Premises liability lawsuits involving potholes, inadequate lighting, lack of security, slippery surfaces, and structural defects in parking facilities causing injuries or enabling criminal attacks.
Amusement Park and Recreational Injuries
Cases involving ride malfunctions, operator negligence, inadequate safety measures, and dangerous conditions at amusement parks, theme parks, and recreational facilities.
Fires and Building Code Violations
Lawsuits arising from fires caused by faulty wiring, lack of smoke detectors, blocked exits, missing fire extinguishers, and other building code violations that prevent safe evacuation.
Retail Store Accidents
Claims involving hazards in grocery stores, department stores, shopping malls, and other retail establishments including wet floors, fallen merchandise, and inadequate maintenance.
Pennsylvania Premises Liability FAQs
Surveillance footage is critical evidence that can prove exactly what happened, how long hazards existed, and counter property owner defenses. However, many properties erase footage after 30-90 days. Your attorney must act immediately to preserve this evidence through spoliation letters and legal demands. If property owners destroy footage after receiving preservation demands, courts may presume the footage would have supported your case. Even if footage doesn’t exist, your attorney will document this fact and explain to juries why property owners should have had functioning cameras, particularly in inadequate security cases.
Simple cases with clear liability and well-documented injuries might resolve in 6-12 months. More complex cases involving disputed liability, serious injuries requiring ongoing treatment, or multiple defendants typically take 18-36 months from filing through settlement or trial. Ensure all future medical needs are accounted for. While faster resolution is tempting, rushing can result in under-compensation if injuries worsen or costs exceed initial estimates. Your
Philadelphia premises liability accident lawyer will work efficiently while ensuring you receive full compensation.
Most premises liability cases settle before trial, often during or shortly after discovery when both sides understand the strength of the evidence. Property owners and their insurance companies typically want to avoid the unpredictability and expense of trial. However, having an attorney prepared to try your case is essential to achieving fair settlement offers. Insurance companies offer more when they know you have experienced trial counsel. Settlement negotiations often intensify as trial approaches.
Liability depends on who controlled the area where you were injured and who was responsible for maintenance. Landlords typically remain liable for common areas (hallways, stairs, parking lots) while tenants are responsible for their leased space. However, if the landlord knew of hazards in the tenant’s space and failed to address them, or if the lease assigns certain maintenance responsibilities to the landlord, the landlord may share liability. In many cases, both landlord and tenant may be liable, allowing recovery from multiple insurance policies.
Property owners must conduct regular, reasonable inspections and address hazards promptly. Simply claiming they cleaned recently doesn’t absolve liability if hazards developed afterward. The key question is whether they had actual or constructive notice of the hazard and reasonable time to address it. Your attorney will investigate cleaning and inspection logs (which are often created after accidents or are incomplete), employee schedules and responsibilities, prior incident reports, and how long the condition actually existed. Surveillance footage can be critical in proving how long hazards existed before your accident.
Case value depends on multiple factors including injury severity, medical expenses (past and future), lost income and earning capacity, permanent disabilities, pain and suffering, scarring or disfigurement, and how the injury impacts your daily life. Every case is different. Your premises liability attorney will calculate damages based on medical evidence, expert testimony, and comparable verdicts in similar cases.
Property owners owe limited duties to trespassers; generally only to avoid willful or wanton harm. However, there are exceptions. If the property owner knew trespassers frequently entered the property (like an attractive nuisance such as a pool), they may owe a higher duty. Children who trespass receive special protections if the property owner knew or should have known children might be attracted to dangerous conditions on the property. Additionally, if you initially entered lawfully (as a customer) but then accessed a restricted area, you may still have a valid claim.
Pennsylvania follows a modified comparative negligence rule. Meaning that you can still recover damages as long as you’re less than 51% at fault for the accident. However, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you’re awarded $100,000 but found 20% at fault, you’d receive $80,000. Insurance companies often exaggerate victim fault to reduce payouts. Common arguments include that you weren’t paying attention, were distracted, or the hazard was “obvious.” Your premises liability lawyer will counter these arguments with evidence showing the property owner’s negligence was the primary cause.
Proving knowledge requires demonstrating either actual notice (the owner or employees knew about the hazard) or constructive notice (the condition existed long enough that reasonable inspections would have discovered it). Evidence includes prior incident reports showing similar accidents in the same location, maintenance logs showing repeated issues, complaints from other customers or tenants, surveillance footage showing how long the hazard existed, work orders for repairs, and employee statements. Your Philadelphia premise liability lawyer will obtain these records through discovery and subpoenas. The longer a hazard existed, the stronger the argument that the property owner should have known about it.
Seek medical attention immediately, even if injuries seem minor. Some serious injuries don’t show symptoms right away, so take it seriously. Report the accident to the property owner, manager, or staff and request they document it in an incident report. Ask for a copy. Take photos of the hazard that caused your fall, including the surrounding area, lighting conditions, and any warning signs (or lack thereof). Photograph your injuries and the clothing/shoes you were wearing. Get contact information from witnesses who saw the accident. Preserve physical evidence like torn clothing or damaged shoes. Do not give recorded statements to insurance adjusters without consulting a premises liability attorney first.
In most cases, Pennsylvania law requires that a premises liability lawsuit be filed within two years from the date of injury. This deadline is known as the statute of limitations. If a claim is not filed within this time frame, the court may permanently bar you from pursuing compensation, regardless of the strength of the case.
Additional factors can also influence the filing deadline, including whether the claim involves a government-owned property, a minor injured in the accident, or a wrongful death claim. Claims against government entities require special notice within six months and have specific filing procedures. When minors are involved, the statute of limitations may be tolled (paused) until they reach age 18.





